Home
Home
Home

Tag: passive-income

  • Meralco as a “Natural Hedge”: How JG Summit Buffered a Cyclical Petrochemical Bet

    Meralco as a “Natural Hedge”: How JG Summit Buffered a Cyclical Petrochemical Bet

    We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us!

    In conglomerate finance, the most effective hedges are not always derivatives. Often, they are portfolio choices—owning a defensive, cash-generative asset that can steady the ship when a cyclical business turns against you. JG Summit Holdings (JGS) offers a timely example. While its petrochemical unit has endured a punishing global downcycle, JGS’s long-held stake in Manila Electric Co. (Meralco, MER) has acted as a stabilizer through recurring dividends, a large mark-to-market value, and a demonstrated ability to raise cash via block sales when needed.

    The contrast is stark. Petrochemicals are exposed to global supply additions, feedstock spreads, and demand swings—variables that can remain unfavorable for years. JGS itself acknowledged that “unfavorable polymer margins” continued to weigh on JG Summit Olefins Corp. (JGSOC) even as the group posted stronger consolidated revenues in 2024. Market reports describing JGSOC’s performance underscore the severity of the trough: 2024 revenue rose on higher volumes, yet margins remained under pressure, translating into sizable EBITDA and net losses and culminating in an indefinite commercial shutdown early 2025 to stem further losses.

    Against that backdrop, Meralco sits on the other end of the risk spectrum. As a regulated distribution utility, it is structurally positioned to generate steadier cash flows than commodity-linked petrochemicals. JGS highlights Meralco among its core investments, disclosing an equity stake of 26.4% and placing the market value of that stake at ₱145.0 billion as of December 27, 2024—a clear signal of the holding’s financial weight at the parent level. That “core investment” framing matters: it suggests Meralco is not merely a passive financial bet, but a strategic anchor that contributes to dividends, balance-sheet flexibility, and investor confidence—especially when other units face headwinds.

    Built early: the hedge predates the petrochem stress

    The Meralco position was not assembled as an after-the-fact rescue line. JGS built it early and deliberately. In 2013, the group made its initial Meralco investment by purchasing San Miguel’s stake—reported at ₱72 billion—marking JGS’s entry into power distribution and diversifying its earnings base. This foundation was later reinforced: by mid-2017, JGS disclosed it acquired an additional 27.5 million Meralco shares at ₱250 per share, raising its stake to 29.56%—a move that increased its exposure to Meralco’s dividend stream and long-term value.

    Then came a critical feature of good hedges: optional liquidity. In July 2022, JGS executed a block sale of 36 million Meralco shares at ₱344 per share, raising ₱12.384 billion and reducing its stake from roughly 29.56% to “over 26%.” The transaction demonstrated that the Meralco holding was not only valuable on paper—it could also be mobilized to strengthen the parent balance sheet when market windows open, without fully exiting the investment.

    The cash engine: dividends that keep arriving

    Dividends are where the hedge becomes tangible. Meralco’s dividend history shows a consistent pattern of cash distributions, including semi-annual payouts in recent years (for example, declared cash dividends in 2024 and 2025). For a holding company, these recurring inflows serve multiple purposes: they can support debt service, fund capex elsewhere, or provide a buffer during periods when a cyclical subsidiary requires support.

    In JGS’s case, this dynamic is particularly relevant given management’s disclosures about macro and segment headwinds. JGS’s 2024 CEO report explicitly cited prolonged petrochemical weakness as one of the group’s major crosswinds, even as other units benefited from improving demand. When a cyclical business is under stress, stable dividends from core investments become more than a yield story—they become time and optionality for the parent.

    Mark-to-market ballast: the stake is big enough to matter

    A hedge is only as good as its scale. Here, Meralco’s contribution is not marginal. JGS itself disclosed a ₱145.0 billion market value for its Meralco stake as of late December 2024, making it one of the parent’s most financially consequential portfolio assets. Moreover, publicly available market quotes around early October 2025 place Meralco shares in the mid-₱500s range, reinforcing that the stake remains a substantial mark-to-market component of JGS’s overall valuation picture.

    This matters in a very practical way. If investors are assessing worst-case scenarios for petrochemicals—such as heavy impairments or debt absorption—Meralco’s stake provides an immediately observable asset base that can temper those fears. It does not erase risk, but it changes the conversation from “existential threat” to “balance-sheet management,” especially when the parent reports consolidated equity and maintains access to capital markets.

    A portfolio lesson: manage correlation, not just exposure

    The broader lesson for Philippine holding companies is about correlation. Cyclical businesses can be profitable over time, but they can also compress cash flows simultaneously—especially in downturns that hit multiple sectors. A portfolio that includes a large, dividend-paying, comparatively defensive investment can soften the blow and preserve strategic flexibility.

    JG Summit’s experience illustrates how this can work in practice: a volatile industrial business faces a prolonged trough, while a regulated utility stake continues to provide cash returns and balance-sheet ballast. The Meralco position—built in 2013, expanded in 2017, partially monetized in 2022, and still meaningful today—has effectively served as a natural hedge against the risks inherent in heavy-asset cyclicals.

    In the end, the most useful hedge is the one you can hold through the storm. For JGS, Meralco has been that asset—cash-generative, sizable, and credibly monetizable—while petrochemicals navigates an unforgiving global cycle. 

    We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us!

  • SPC’s outsized 2025 dividend: signal, not trap—yet

    SPC’s outsized 2025 dividend: signal, not trap—yet

    SPC Power Corporation surprised the market with a year‑end ₱0.80/share cash dividend—lifting full‑year distributions to ₱1.20/share—after its Board approval on December 9, 2025 (record Dec 26, payable on/before Jan 9, 2026). That move caps a year of margin recovery and leaves investors wondering whether it is sustainable or a one‑off flourish. 

    At ₱9.00, the combined ₱1.20/share payout implies a ~13.3% full‑year yield—eye‑catching for a net‑cash utility. On trailing measures, independent trackers had SPC’s yield in the 4.4–5.0% range before the latest announcement, reflecting the earlier ₱0.40 mid‑year dividend; the step‑up reframes the yield conversation decisively.

    Crucially, 2025’s earnings quality improved. SPC’s 9M‑2025 total comprehensive income rose to ₱1.744B, and EPS reached ₱1.17, even as reported revenues dipped (–10.3%) due to lower pass‑through fuel costs. The gross margin surged to ₱1.494B (from ₱228.5M in 9M‑2024) on cost optimization and better plant utilization; management notes the generation segment contributed ~72% of net income this year, tilting results back toward core operations rather than associates.

    On coverage, the numbers are reassuring—but nuanced. Operating cash flow (OCF) for 9M‑2025 stood at ₱1.279B, while cash & cash equivalents were a hefty ₱6.181B—with a current ratio of 11.47 and debt ratio ~0.06, underscoring a net‑cash profile. That means the ₱0.80 year‑end dividend (~₱1.197B) is cash‑covered with room to spare; total FY dividends (~₱1.796B) are covered ~3.4× by cash on hand, though only ~0.71× by 9M OCF—so Q4 cash generation matters for purists who want dividends funded from operations alone.

    Associates still play a material role. SPC’s equity share in the earnings of KSPC/MECO was ₱491.0M in 9M‑2025 (down year‑on‑year), yet cash dividends received from associates reached about ₱852.4M over the same period—significant support for parent‑level liquidity. The strategic overlay: Korean media report KEPCO plans to divest its 60% stake in KSPC (SPC owns 40%), potentially reshaping governance and dividend policy at the associate level. That is not inherently negative, but it warrants monitoring because associate cash flows have historically augmented SPC’s payout capacity.

    Market conditions are a swing factor, too. The Independent Electricity Market Operator (IEMOP) has expressed optimism for stable/lower WESM prices in 2025 amid ample supply—good for consumers, more challenging for merchant margins if generators cannot offset via efficiency or contracted sales. SPC’s 2025 margin expansion shows it can win on costs; sustaining this in a soft price environment will demand continued operational discipline.

    One structural lever is battery energy storage. On October 17, 2025, a wholly owned subsidiary signed supply and EPC contracts for BESS projects in Panay (100 MWh) and Bohol (60 MWh)—positioning SPC to capture ancillary and flexibility revenues as rules mature. The policy groundwork for BESS in the WESM has been laid over recent years; execution will dictate how quickly these assets translate into earnings that can buttress future dividends.

    So is SPC’s dividend sustainable—or a value trap? On the evidence, not a value trap. SPC in 2025 showed improved core margins, sits on net cash with minimal leverage, and holds ample liquidity to fund distributions, even at the enhanced year‑end rate. The magnitude of the ₱1.20/share payout, however, is above a normal run rate and depends on Q4 earnings and, to a degree, associate cash flows. In other words, ongoing dividends look supportable; repeating 2025’s size every year would require continued operational strength and no adverse surprises from KSPC or WESM pricing.

    For investors, the watch‑list is straightforward: (1) FY‑2025/Q4 results to confirm post‑payout cash and operating cover; (2) KSPC ownership changes and any shift in dividend policy; (3) WESM price trajectory and SPC’s contracted versus merchant mix; and (4) BESS milestones and monetization in the ancillary/Reserve Market. If these line up, baseline dividends (₱0.40–₱0.60) look comfortably repeatable, with top‑ups plausible in stronger years. 

    We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us!

  • From Gas to Media: Why a ₱50‑Billion Windfall Could Be the Lopez Group’s Lifeline

    From Gas to Media: Why a ₱50‑Billion Windfall Could Be the Lopez Group’s Lifeline

    The Weekend Read from the Trading Desk: How upstreaming First Gen’s proceeds to First Philippine Holdings could stabilize ABS‑CBN—and safeguard the conglomerate’s access to bank capital.

    The moment that changed the calculus

    When Prime Infrastructure Capital, Inc. reached financial close on November 17–18, 2025, for its ₱50‑billion purchase of a 60% stake in First Gen Corporation’s (FGEN) Batangas gas platform—spanning the Santa Rita, San Lorenzo, San Gabriel, Avion plants and the offshore LNG terminal—the news cycle framed it as an energy transition milestone. But the deal also cracked open a once‑in‑a‑decade capital window for the Lopez Group: with liquidity crystallized at FGEN, the conglomerate can channel cash upstream to First Philippine Holdings (FPH) and redeploy it where reputational risk is highest—ABS‑CBN. 

    Prime Infra’s majority control across the mid‑stream and downstream gas value chain complements its upstream Malampaya operations, while FGEN retains 40% and a strategic voice—ensuring continuity and synergies even as capital is released. For Lopez watchers, the takeaway is simple: a ₱50‑billion windfall now sits where intercorporate cash movements are feasible and fast.

    Why the windfall matters beyond energy

    FPH directly and indirectly owns ~67.84% of FGEN’s common stock, giving it clear governance over dividend policy. That ownership is documented in PSE corporate filings and corroborated by independent market data services. In other words, FPH is positioned to receive any special cash dividends that FGEN’s board might declare in the wake of the Prime Infra transaction. 

    Critically, intercorporate dividends from a domestic corporation to another domestic corporation are tax‑exempt under Philippine law; such dividends are excluded from the recipient’s taxable income. This means FGEN → FPH cash upstreaming can occur with minimal leakage—a powerful lever when capital needs to move quickly within a group to neutralize risk elsewhere.

    The crisis in the media arm—now a group‑wide concern

    ABS‑CBN’s financial condition remains strained five years after the franchise loss. Public disclosures and Q3 2025 updates indicate ongoing losses and—more worryingly—technical default dynamics: loan covenant breaches and reclassification of interest‑bearing loans as current, which signal heightened acceleration risk. Even as content partnerships and digital pivots slowly rebuild revenue, liquidity remains tight. 

    Under the Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act (FRIA), insolvency is assessed via cash‑flow (inability to pay debts as they fall due) and balance‑sheet (liabilities exceeding assets) tests. ABS‑CBN is not balance‑sheet insolvent today, but the cash‑flow risk is elevated because a technical default can quickly morph into payment default if lenders accelerate. That is the trigger point boards are paid to anticipate—and defuse.

    The imperative: protect bankability across the Lopez constellation

    Why move now? Because bank lenders assess conglomerates holistically. A distressed flagship can contaminate credit perceptions for siblings; in practice, ABS‑CBN’s covenant issues may constrain Lopez units’ access to new loans or favorable terms, no matter how robust their standalone metrics. For a group whose growth engine relies on long‑tenor project finance in power, real estate, and infrastructure, this is existential. The Prime Infra–FGEN deal gives Lopez the means to restore confidence quickly by stabilizing ABS‑CBN and thereby protecting the group’s credit story. 

    In capital markets, optics matter as much as numbers: a clean resolution of ABS‑CBN’s near‑term maturities and covenants reassures banks and rating committees that the group can manage cross‑portfolio risk. That reassurance is exactly what the windfall is designed to buy.

    How the money moves: fast, tax‑efficient upstreaming

    Mechanically, the simplest route is for FGEN to declare a special cash dividend, which FPH receives tax‑exempt as a domestic intercorporate dividend. FPH can then deploy proceeds into ABS‑CBN through equity infusion, secured shareholder loans, or escrowed cure funds structured to address current debt and lender waivers. The tax rules are clear, and the corporate records confirm FPH’s control of FGEN—a high‑certainty path with minimal friction. 

    Alternative capital return mechanisms—such as share buybacks or capital reductions—exist, but dividends are faster and cleaner for a time‑critical stabilization. The key is calibrating size: ₱12–₱15 billion can cure covenants, reclassify loans to noncurrent, and restore working capital; ₱20–₱24 billion provides a full reset, retiring near‑term debt and funding a 12‑month runway for operational turnaround.

    The rescue blueprint in three moves

    Move 1: Cure acceleration risk.
    FPH funds an escrow to prepay or secure waivers on ABS‑CBN’s current loans, taking the oxygen away from technical default. This resets the maturity wall, buys time, and signals lender discipline at the corporate center. 

    Move 2: Rebuild working capital.
    An equity injection restores the current ratio >1.0 and provides operating liquidity, crucial while monetization from content/IP and digital distribution scales. Stabilization capital is a bridge, not a destination. 

    Move 3: Consolidate governance—cash acquisition or share swap.
    FPH can buy Lopez, Inc.’s 55.82% block of ABS‑CBN (documented in PSE Top‑100 stockholders lists and media ownership monitors), triggering a mandatory tender offer to minorities at the same price; or execute a share‑for‑share exchange that may qualify as a tax‑free reorganization under Section 40(C)(2). Both routes put ABS‑CBN inside FPH—simplifying accountability and capital discipline. 

    The rules of engagement: tender offers and antitrust

    In the Philippines, the Securities Regulation Code (SRC) Rule 19 requires a mandatory tender offer when a person or group crosses control thresholds (e.g., ≥35% or >50%), or builds ≥15% within a year with intent declared. Offers can be cash or shares; fairness opinions are standard to protect minority holders. Proper sequencing and disclosures keep the process compliant and clean. 

    On antitrust, the Philippine Competition Commission (PCC) increased notification thresholds effective March 1, 2025, to ₱8.5 billion (Size of Party) and ₱3.5 billion (Size of Transaction). A FPH–ABS‑CBN control deal would likely surpass both, requiring compulsory notification and a formal review. PCC practice is established; early pre‑consultations can streamline timelines.

    Share‑for‑share swaps: attractive—but mind the dilution

    A share‑for‑share exchange offers an elegant, potentially tax‑deferred path under Section 40(C)(2) (CREATE), provided consideration is solely voting stock and the acquirer gains control. However, swaps issue new FPH shares, risking dilution of Lopez’s control at FPH if minorities receive paper. Boards must calibrate swap ratios to preserve governance while achieving consolidation. 

    The cash acquisition alternative addresses dilution outright. With liquidity from FGEN in hand, FPH can buy the controlling block and run the tender offer in cash—a faster, simpler route when the imperative is stability and bank optics. 

    FRIA as the backstop—why you don’t want to use it

    While FRIA provides a court‑supervised path for rehabilitation with stay orders and receiver oversight, it is a backstop—not a strategy. Filing invites public scrutiny and can chill lenders across the group. The smarter move is pre‑emptive stabilization: cure covenants, remove acceleration threat, and avoid the optics of judicial intervention. Rescue capital is cheaper than the uncertainty of FRIA. 

    In short, FRIA is your Plan Z. If FGEN’s windfall exists precisely to avoid cross‑portfolio contagion, using FRIA would contradict the whole purpose of upstreaming liquidity. 

    Banking relationships: the real prize

    For a conglomerate like Lopez, bankability underpins everything—from geothermal expansions to industrial parks and high‑rise communities. The Prime Infra–FGEN deal strengthens the energy narrative, but ABS‑CBN’s unresolved maturities can still cast a shadow. Stabilization is therefore not merely a media rescue; it is a capital markets strategy to protect borrowing capacity at scale. 

    Bank credit committees do not compartmentalize risk as neatly as organograms do. Demonstrating swift, disciplined resolution at ABS‑CBN sends a signal that group governance is active and integrated—a signal banks reward with pricing and availability. 

    Governance and optics: doing right by minorities

    If FPH acquires ABS‑CBN control, minority shareholders must be offered the same price via the tender offer. Independent fairness opinions and transparent valuation disclosures mitigate controversy and preserve trust. In prior public M&A, these mechanics have helped align stakeholder expectations and reduce litigation risk. The playbook is established; the onus is on execution quality. 

    For antitrust, scheduling and completeness matter. PCC has clear thresholds and review processes; a disciplined filing is table stakes. Early engagement often trims the calendar and clarifies scope, limiting uncertainty for lenders and markets. 

    A realistic timeline

    Weeks 0–8: FGEN Board approves special dividend; FPH receives cash tax‑exempt and announces allocation priorities.
    Weeks 4–16: FPH funds loan cure/waivers and injects working capital into ABS‑CBN; public updates reinforce lender confidence.
    Weeks 8–26: Execute cash acquisition of controlling block and launch tender offer; notify PCC; close and integrate governance. 

    What success looks like in 12–18 months

    • ABS‑CBN: No technical default; current ratio >1.0; maturities normalized; EBITDA trending positive on content/IP monetization and disciplined costs. 
    • FPH: Governance simplified (FPH → ABS‑CBN), capital discipline visible, and borrowing capacity intact for renewables and real estate. 
    • FGEN: Balanced energy portfolio post‑transaction, with renewables expansion funded and gas partnership synergy intact.

    The cost of inaction

    Conglomerates are judged by how they manage the weakest link. If ABS‑CBN’s debt profile remains unresolved, lenders will price risk across the group, blurring distinctions between strong and weak units. With ₱50 billion already realized at FGEN, failing to upstream and act would be a strategy error—one that risks higher funding costs and constrained growth at precisely the wrong moment for the Philippines’ clean‑energy and infrastructure agenda.

    The Lopez Group has the tools, the capital, and—thanks to Prime Infra—the timing. This isn’t just about saving a media icon; it’s about protecting bankability and future‑proofing a storied conglomerate. Rescue capital today is the price of strategic freedom tomorrow. 

    Sidebar: Who owns what—and why it helps

    Public data shows Lopez, Inc. as ABS‑CBN’s controlling shareholder (about 55.82% of common shares), with FPH controlling FGEN and thereby the dividend spigot. Consolidation of ABS‑CBN into FPH—whether by cash acquisition or share swap—aligns incentives and simplifies lender narratives. Ownership clarity and capital discipline are precisely what credit committees want to see when risk needs to be re‑rated. 

    The closing argument

    A ₱50‑billion energy transaction has created a once‑in‑a‑generation opportunity to stabilize ABS‑CBN and protect the Lopez Group’s access to bank capital. The mechanics are straightforward, the tax path is efficient, and the regulatory routes are well‑trodden. In corporate strategy, timing is everything. The Lopez Group’s moment is now.

    Subscribe to Support Free & Independent Research

  • Maynilad’s PSE Debut Underscores Defensive Strength and Value Appeal; Dividend Yield Tops 7%

    Maynilad’s PSE Debut Underscores Defensive Strength and Value Appeal; Dividend Yield Tops 7%

    Maynilad Water Services Inc., newly listed on the Philippine Stock Exchange, is emerging as a standout defensive play despite its capital-intensive nature. The company’s latest financial results and dividend policy highlight its resilience, long-term value proposition, and income potential that rival those of top-performing REITs.

    Defensive Profile Backed by Strong Results

    Maynilad operates in the water and wastewater sector—an essential service with stable demand across economic cycles. Under its Revised Concession Agreement (RCA), the company earns a fixed nominal 12% return on approved expenditures, with cost recovery guaranteed through tariff adjustments. The concession term, extended to 2047, aligns with its legislative franchise, ensuring predictable cash flows for decades.

    Financial performance for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, reinforces this defensive positioning:

    • Operating revenue: ₱27.65 billion, up 9.5% year-on-year, driven by wastewater revenue growth of nearly 30% following the environmental charge increase to 25%.
    • Net income: ₱11.41 billion, up 18.1% YoY, despite heavy capital spending.
    • EBITDA: Approximately ₱19.9 billion, providing 9× interest coverage, even as debt rose to ₱93.6 billion to fund expansion.
    • Equity: ₱80.5 billion, with net-debt-to-equity at a manageable 1.08×.

    These figures show Maynilad can absorb large-scale investments without compromising financial stability—a hallmark of a defensive stock.

    Capex Recovery Guaranteed

    Unlike many capital-intensive businesses that face uncertainty in recouping investments, Maynilad’s model ensures full recovery of capital expenditures through regulated rate adjustments. Every five years, the rate-rebasing process allows the company to recover prudently incurred costs and earn its guaranteed return. This mechanism transforms heavy capex into a predictable earnings driver rather than a risk factor.

    Dividend Sustainability and Competitive Yield

    Maynilad declared ₱6.4 billion in cash dividends for 2025, or ₱1.14 per share, representing a 56% payout ratio and a dividend cover of 1.78×. At its recent closing price of ₱16.06, this translates to a dividend yield of about 7.1%—competitive with, and in some cases higher than, leading Philippine REITs, which typically offer 6%–7.5%.

    Unappropriated retained earnings of ₱25.98 billion and strong operating metrics provide additional cushion, signaling that Maynilad can sustain generous payouts even amid its ₱160-billion capex program through 2027.

    Value Proposition and Growth Drivers

    The ongoing rate-rebasing cycle (2023–2027) ensures incremental tariff hikes, including a ₱2.12/m³ adjustment effective January 2025, alongside the higher environmental charge. These measures, coupled with wastewater expansion and forex risk mitigation via FCDA mechanisms, underpin predictable earnings growth.

    Bottom Line

    Maynilad’s listing offers investors a unique proposition:

    • Defensive strength through essential services and regulated returns.
    • Guaranteed capex recovery via tariff adjustments, reducing investment risk.
    • Value appeal via sustainable dividends and a competitive yield of 7.1% at current prices.
    • Long-term visibility supported by a concession extended to 2047 and a tariff path locked in through 2027.

    For income-focused and value investors, Maynilad stands out as a stock that combines resilience with rewarding cash returns—an alternative to REITs with the added advantage of inflation-linked, regulated cash flows.

    Subscribe to Support Independent Research

  • Cebu Landmasters Powers Ahead: Strong Q3 Results Signal Sustained Growth

    Cebu Landmasters Powers Ahead: Strong Q3 Results Signal Sustained Growth


    Cebu City, Philippines – Cebu Landmasters, Inc. (CLI), the VisMin real estate leader, delivered another quarter of resilient growth, reinforcing its position as one of the country’s fastest-expanding developers. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, CLI posted ₱14.34 billion in consolidated revenues, up 13% on a comparable basis, and a net income of ₱3.10 billion, marking a 6% year-on-year increase despite a challenging macro environment.

    The company’s recurring income streams surged, with hospitality revenues doubling (+101%) and leasing income climbing 49%, underscoring CLI’s successful diversification beyond residential projects. Its hotel portfolio now spans four operational properties, including the newly opened Citadines Bacolod City, with two more hotels set to launch before year-end and six under construction—solidifying CLI’s future REIT ambitions.

    Residential demand remains robust, with reservation sales soaring 27% to ₱19.33 billion and an impressive 93% sell-out rate across its portfolio. The mid-market Garden Series led growth with a 31% revenue jump, while the economic Casa Mira Series continued to dominate VisMin’s affordable housing segment.

    CLI’s balance sheet remains strong, with total assets up 18% to ₱128.72 billion and a current ratio of 1.51x, comfortably meeting all debt covenants. Strategic funding moves—including a ₱5 billion sustainability-linked bond issuance and ₱1.59 billion redeemable preferred shares—position the company to accelerate expansion while maintaining financial flexibility.

    Investor confidence is high, buoyed by CLI’s consistent dividend payouts (₱0.18 per share in April) and a share price of ₱2.32, translating to an attractive ~7.8% yield. With recurring income scaling rapidly, a strong pipeline of projects, and VisMin market leadership reaffirmed by Colliers, CLI is poised for sustained growth and value creation.

    Bottom line: CLI’s Q3 performance signals a compelling growth story—anchored on robust residential demand, rising recurring income, and disciplined financial management. For investors seeking exposure to VisMin’s booming property market, CLI remains a standout pick.

    Subscribe to Support Independent Research

  • Ayala Land’s Share Price Finds Support From Recurring Income—But Financing Strain, Macro Risks Keep Valuation in Check

    Ayala Land’s Share Price Finds Support From Recurring Income—But Financing Strain, Macro Risks Keep Valuation in Check


    Makati City, Philippines (Nov. 23, 2025) — Ayala Land, Inc. (ALI) is navigating a delicate balance between strengthening recurring income and mounting financing pressures as investors reassess the stock’s valuation and dividend appeal heading into year‑end.

    Trading snapshot (latest PSE prints)

    ALI has traded in a tight band around ₱19–₱21 over the past week. Recent closes include ₱19.36 on Nov. 19, ₱20.05 on Nov. 20, and ₱21.00 on Nov. 21, reflecting choppy sentiment and heavier volumes around the company’s buyback executions. The 52‑week range now sits near ₱18.64–₱30.55, underscoring the stock’s de‑rating from 1H peaks as macro and sector headwinds intensified.

    On Nov. 20, ALI disclosed multiple buyback trades between ₱19.30 and ₱20.15 (3.0 million shares), a signal that management is willing to provide price support while executing its capital program. 

    Earnings and operating mix

    In its 9M 2025 filing, ALI posted ₱21.38B net income (+1% YoY) on ₱121.83B consolidated revenues (−3% YoY). A sturdier leasing & hospitality base (malls +4%, offices +6%, hotels +4%) and industrial real estate +39% helped offset softer services (construction −30%; property management & others −50%) and uneven property development.

     
    The company also acquired the 578‑room New World Makati Hotel on July 1, 2025, strengthening its hospitality footprint; and advanced property‑for‑share swaps with AREIT, including a ₱20.99B SEC‑approved infusion effective July 1 and a ₱19.5B mall infusion (Ayala Center Cebu, Ayala Malls Feliz) approved by the board on Oct. 29 pending final clearances—both intended to deepen recurring income and recycle capital. 

    Valuation: multiples tied to debt metrics

    While prime assets and estate strategy historically supported ALI’s premium, recent prints show the market applying mid‑single‑digit to low‑double‑digit P/E territory as financing costs rose and short‑term leverage increased. External trackers pegged ALI’s trailing valuation around ~9.4x–10.0x P/E in mid‑November, with P/B near ~0.9–1.0x, consistent with a cautious stance toward property names amid macro uncertainty. 

    The risk side of the ledger is visible in the interim numbers: interest & financing charges +11% YoY to ₱12.71B, “other charges” +75% (larger discounts on receivable sales), short‑term debt +152% to ₱52.10B, and a lower interest coverage of 4.92× alongside a current ratio of 1.51×. Investors typically reflect these in higher discount rates for DCFs and in multiple compression, unless recurring income growth and asset recycling demonstrably outpace the financing drag.

    Dividend yield: supportive, but tied to cash discipline

    ALI declared ₱0.2888/share (1H) and ₱0.2928/share (2H) for 2025. At recent prices, the indicated annual payout of ~₱0.58/share translates to yields of roughly 2.7%–3.1% depending on the day’s close (e.g., ₱21.00 vs. ₱19.36), positioning ALI as a defensive yield play if share price softness persists. However, the market remains focused on free‑cash‑flow coverage amid higher interest expense and the timing of AREIT transactions; several trackers show the dividend yield near ~3%–4.5% in mid‑November, reflecting differing price points and methodologies. 

    Macro overlay: BSP easing vs. growth and FX risks

    The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas cut the policy rate to 4.75% on Oct. 9, and another 25‑bp “baby step” cut is possible at the Dec. 11 meeting—constructive for funding costs across property developers. Still, Q3 GDP slowed to ~4%, and caution remains around peso volatility if easing outpaces U.S. policy, an overhang for imported inputs, and investor confidence.

    What moves the stock from here

    • Upside case: Accelerated industrial/logistics roll‑outs, continued mall reinvention with high lease‑out rates (malls ~91%; offices ~90%), and AREIT monetizations that lift recurring income and lower net leverage—helping defend multiples and add support to the dividend. 
    • Watch‑items: Execution risk in reinvention works; receivable sale discounting impacting “other charges”; Core residential softness and foreign buyer pullback (Chinese sales down −81%) that can prolong the de‑rating unless premium NCR verticals maintain momentum; and the short‑term debt bulge that keeps the spotlight on interest coverage.

    Investor takeaway

    With the stock hovering around ₱19–₱21 and the 52‑week floor near ₱18.64, ALI’s valuation and yield are increasingly tied to tangible progress in scaling recurring income and managing the financing load. The buyback activity around ₱19–₱20 indicates management’s conviction, but consensus sentiment will likely hinge on debt metrics trending better, cash from AREIT asset rotations landing on time, and leasing metrics staying ahead of sector averages.

    Subscribe to Support Independent Research

  • Jollibee Foods Corporation: A Mature Giant Wearing a Growth Mask

    Jollibee Foods Corporation: A Mature Giant Wearing a Growth Mask

    From the Trading Desk. Shares the trading desk is selling, avoiding, and waiting to see if it corrects.

    Jollibee Foods Corporation (JFC) is the undisputed leader in Philippine quick-service dining. With over 3,400 stores locally and decades of dominance, JFC is a mature company by every textbook measure:

    • High market penetration in its home market
    • Stable cash flows from a loyal customer base
    • Ability to pay consistent dividends—a hallmark of maturity

    In fact, one defining trait of mature firms is a high dividend yield, reflecting limited reinvestment opportunities and a shift toward rewarding shareholders. Yet JFC’s current strategy tells a different story.

    The Growth Narrative

    Instead of leaning into its maturity, JFC is chasing a growth-company image through aggressive acquisitions and international expansion. Tim Ho Wan (premium dim sum), Compose Coffee (South Korea), CBTL, Highlands Coffee, Smashburger—the list is long and expensive. These deals inflate goodwill (₱78.7B as of Q3 2025) and create headlines, but they don’t guarantee earnings accretion.

    Tim Ho Wan, acquired for ₱10.7B in January 2025, posted a ₱86.9M net loss in its first nine months under JFC. Older acquisitions like CBTL and Smashburger were loss-making for years. Even with Compose Coffee’s success (₱1.59B net income in 9M 2025), the overall picture is clear: acquisition losses and financing costs are eating into the profits of JFC’s core Philippine business.

    The Cost of Pretending

    Despite a 14% revenue surge in 9M 2025, net income grew only 1.6%. Why? Debt-funded acquisitions and integration costs. JFC issued senior notes and ramped up short-term borrowings to finance these deals, adding interest expense that drags on earnings.

    This raises a critical question: Should JFC embrace its maturity instead of masking it? A pivot toward higher dividends—even a REIT-like yield—could unlock value for investors seeking income stability rather than speculative growth.

    A Dividend-Focused Strategy

    If JFC accepted its mature status, here’s what it could do:

    1. Reframe capital allocation
      • Pause high-risk acquisitions and focus on optimizing existing brands.
      • Use free cash flow to pay down debt and reduce interest drag.
    2. Target a REIT-like dividend yield
      • Aim for 4–6% annual yield, with a 60–70% payout ratio of normalized net income.
      • Commit to quarterly dividends for predictability.
      • At a hypothetical ₱200 share price, a ₱8–₱12 annual dividend would rival REITs.
    3. Build an income investor narrative
      • Position JFC as a stable cash generator, not a speculative growth stock.
      • Highlight recurring cash flows from franchising and royalties.
    4. Enhance shareholder returns
      • Consider special dividends from divesting underperforming brands.
      • Deploy share buybacks when valuation dips below intrinsic value.

    The Verdict

    JFC is not “pretending” in a deceptive sense—it genuinely wants global scale. But the reality is stark: its domestic engine is mature, and its growth bets are risky and uneven. Until acquisitions deliver consistent profits, JFC looks less like a growth stock and more like a cash-rich incumbent stretching for relevance.

    If the market recalibrates expectations, JFC’s share price could correct to reflect a high-yield, income-oriented profile, rewarding investors who value stability over uncertain expansion.

    Support Independent Research